By Julia Johnson, originally published June 18, 2025 by Spectrum News
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Republican officials in South Carolina are celebrating the Supreme Court’s decision on Wednesday to uphold a Tennessee law barring transgender treatments for minors.
“This ruling is a major victory for South Carolina and the entire country. Protecting our children from irreversible gender-transition procedures should not be controversial — it’s common sense,” Gov. Henry McMaster, R-S.C., wrote on X.
Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, R-S.C. echoed this sentiment, writing, “Amen! Protecting our kids and America’s future generations is a non-negotiable.”
The court ruled in favor of Tennessee by a margin of 6-3 in the decision.
Attorney General Alan Wilson shared his satisfaction with the ruling, saying in a statement, “Today’s decision affirms what we’ve long argued that there is no constitutional right to subject children to life-altering, experimental medical interventions.”
The Senate Republican Caucus was similarly pleased, sharing a celebratory press release.
“We knew this issue would ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court, and today’s decision is exactly what we hoped and prayed for,” said Senator Danny Verdin, R-Laurens. “The facade of so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ is collapsing as Americans begin to see this ideology for what it really is: dangerous.”
Verdin is the Chairman of the Senate Medical Affairs Committee and authored the Senate version of the “Help not Harm” bill prohibiting transgender treatment for minors, which was signed into law by McMaster in May of 2024.
The law was in legal limbo as parties awaited the outcome of Tennessee’s case before the Supreme Court.
McMaster previously led nine other Republican governors in an October amicus brief supporting Tennessee in the United States v. Skrmetti—the case concerning its restrictions on gender-related treatments for transgender minors.
In the court’s opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, he explained, “This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound.”
But, he maintained, the job of the court was solely to determine whether the Equal Protection Clause was violated.
Meanwhile, advocates with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) voiced their disappointment with the Supreme Court’s decision.
“Today the Supreme Court told Tennessee transgender youth and their families that they cannot access healthcare that is vitally important for a successful life,” said Lucas Cameron-Vaughn, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee. “This ruling creates a class of people who politicians believe deserve healthcare, and a class of people who do not. We will continue to stand with transgender people in Tennessee and are committed to realizing a world where all people belong, are valued, and can access the necessary healthcare they need.”
